After Hurricane Helene: Lessons on Law, Water, and Justice in the Heart of Appalachia
Zachary Alberts • October 25, 2024

Please consider donating to Helene Rebuild Collaborative at hurricanehelenewnc.org.

I arrived in Asheville, NC, on October 5th to assist my longtime friend Sam Iatarola, the CFO of the Helene Recovery Collaborative (“HRC”), in providing disaster relief assistance to greater Appalachia and Western North Carolina.

 

Sam’s story began with three friends in a pickup truck at hour zero, delivering resources to anyone who needed help in the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Helene. They performed life-saving search and rescue missions, coordinated with other organizations despite the lack of cell service, and established a network of Starlink satellite internet to communities in need.

 

Within days, HRC was established and grew exponentially, attracting hundreds of volunteers and building a full-time staff of fifteen. As soon as communication was established, HRC’s network expanded from Asheville across Western North Carolina and into parts of Eastern Tennessee. In the chaos of such rapid growth, I was brought on as an administrative consultant to help guide this incredible organization in its mission to rebuild Appalachia. It was an odd combination of experience as an outdoor guide, EMT, law student, and administrator that allowed me to jump into the midst of this relief effort.

 

While consulting, I had time to witness the full extent of Hurricane Helene's devastation in greater Asheville. It was awful. Hundreds of lives were lost, and thousands of structures were damaged or destroyed—devastation I never imagined could come from a hurricane deep in the Appalachian Mountains. Serious environmental disasters followed the hurricane, PVC pipes were lifted from a pip manufacturer and were embedded in the French Broad River for miles; and a plastics plant spill in Marshall, North Carolina rendered the water and mud so corrosive that it melted the rubber muck boots of our volunteers. When I arrived, about seven days after the hurricane, most of Asheville was still without running water or electricity, as the utilities were either overloaded or destroyed.

 

Although I was brought in as a consultant, the legal side of my brain was never fully turned off. This disaster will undoubtedly clog North Carolina’s legal system for decades as toxic torts, CERCLA cases, and other legal actions follow the hurricane’s fallout. Burst dams have threatened the region's hydroelectric stability, and there are likely hundreds of evictions, eminent domain, and other housing issues plaguing those affected by the hurricane.

 

Worse, the disproportionate impact of the hurricane on underserved communities is impossible to ignore. One of my most profound experiences in North Carolina was visiting Swannanoa, a small riverside town that bore the brunt of the French Broad River’s flood. I visited a trailer park where every home was labeled "unsafe," and each lot was now designated a flood zone by Buncombe County. The residents, who already lacked the resources to leave, are now facing a legal battle against the county—a battle they are unprepared to fight and one they likely cannot afford. It will take a team of committed volunteer lawyers to give them the shot they deserve at receiving safe housing. This experience made it painfully clear that the legal system is not designed to address the needs of communities most affected by natural disasters, and those who are already marginalized and underserved are being left out to dry.

 

Yet, my mind wandered to what I know best: water law. Out West, there isn’t enough water; out East, there’s too much water—a story we hear time and again. As I heard stories of people trading water bottles for food and saw water trucks driving over two hours just to find potable water, the distinction between the two regions became less clear and more tragic. Natural disasters like Helene expose the vulnerabilities in our water infrastructure, leading me to wonder: how would Western water law, particularly prior appropriation, handle a disaster like this? What happens if debris blocks the flow of the Colorado River? How would our systems of ditches cope with a disaster that overwhelms our capacity to irrigate?

 

At first, I wasn’t sure if disasters on the scale of hurricanes occur out West. But upon reflection, any amount of forest fires, landslides, avalanches, or volcanic eruptions could all substantially threaten significant rivers. How does prior appropriation function when confronted by extreme strains in water supplies–even worse strains than caused by a 20-year megadrought in Colorado? I’m not sure we know, but the Western water regime may be ill-equipped to handle calamities on the scale of Hurricane Helene.

 

It has been nearly twenty-five days since Hurricane Helene hit North Carolina, and my friends are still delivering resources to the most vulnerable communities. While 95% of Asheville now has non-potable water, many residents in the hollers of Western North Carolina face a winter without heat, running water, or basic sanitation. The suffering from Helene is far from over, but we must study and understand the lessons this disaster offers as soon as possible. "Once in a generation" disasters are now a regular occurrence. How we respond to these lessons and what systems we build to account for a new century of natural disasters is for us to decide.

 

Zachary Alberts is the Editor-in-Chief of the Water Law Review. His love for the whitewater and community of Western North Carolina inspires him every day.

 

 


By Hunter LaClair December 9, 2025
Last spring, my colleague wrote a post forecasting uncertainties surrounding the Post-2026 Operating Guidelines for the Colorado River Basin States’ negotiation. Now, just seven months later, the November deadline for state consensus regarding the Basin’s management has passed and precarity has compounded. Without an agreement by the new, February 14th, 2026 deadline, the federal government is slotted to assume a managerial role over the Basin’s water. While this outcome bears a familiar mark of uncertainty, it also carries major implications for the Tribal Nations that hold rights to the Basin. This post briefly summarizes the negotiations, their progression, and an important tribal consideration. To briefly refresh or acquaint new readers to this matter: the Post-2026 Operating Guidelines represent a complex management scheme for Lake Mead and Lake Powell’s water operations. In essence, the Guidelines determine how much water can be removed from the two reservoirs. Owing to the reservoirs’ ubiquity in the Western United States, these Guidelines will implicate the water rights of seven states and thirty Tribal Nations. The reality is multiple stakeholders divvy up a dwindling resource, negotiate slowly, and, resultingly, leave many unsure whether the States will reach consensus after recently missing the November 11 th deadline. Many variables factor into the stalling negotiations, including the Upper Basin’s reluctancy to accept water cuts and electoral accountability to respective state populaces. Important considerations for states with large tribal presences complicate these factors, like Arizona, where twenty-two of the Basin’s affected Tribes are located. While from the outset, several Tribes held senior water rights—entitling them to priority over junior right-holders—many Tribes have been forced to bargain away this advantageous position for much needed infrastructure. This phenomenon leaves Tribes within the Basin much more susceptible to State decisions to accept water cuts, hinging tribal access to the already scarce resource on interstate bargains like those now set to conclude in February. Together with the obvious challenges created by the missed deadline and fast-approaching February fallback, these dynamics create large obstacles for the Basin states as they look to reach consensus in the new year. Unfortunately, as so often occurs, tribal nations are left hanging in the balance awaiting state compromise. SOURCES  · Allie Parker, The Impacts of the Post-2026 Colorado River Discussions on Tribal Water Rights, U. Denv. Water L. Rev., (Apr. 3, 2025), https://www.duwaterlawreview.com/the-impacts-of-the-post-2026-colorado-river-discussions-on-tribal-water-rights . · U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Colorado River Post 2026 Operations, https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/post2026/ (last visited Oct. 30, 2025). · The Colorado River, Post-2026 Negotiations, https://coloradoriver.com/post-2026-negotiations/ , (last visited Oct. 30, 2025). · Shannon Mullane, What’s holding up the Colorado River negotiations? Experts break down the sticking points, Colorado Sun (Oct. 30, 2025), https://coloradosun.com/2025/10/30/colorado-river-negotiations-experts-sticking-points/ . · Arizona Department of Education, 22 Federally Recognized Tribes in Arizona, https://www.azed.gov/oie/22-federally-recognized-tribes-arizona (last visited Oct. 29, 2025). · NRDC, Colorado River Basin Tribes Address a Historic Drought–and Their Water Rights–Head-On, https://www.nrdc.org/stories/colorado-river-basin-tribes-address-historic-drought-and-their-water-rights-head (last visited Oct. 30, 2025). · Michael Elizabeth Sakas, Historically excluded from Colorado River policy, tribes want a say in how the dwindling resource is used. Access to clean water is a start, CPR News, https://www.cpr.org/2021/12/07/tribes-historically-excluded-colorado-river-policy-use-want-say-clean-water-access/ (Dec. 7, 2021).
By Matthew Scribner April 15, 2025
Drought on Arrival: The Southwest’s Grim 2025 Outlook